Responding to the needs of their customers, and accepting of the fact that currency was scarce in most rural communities, shopkeepers offered many of their goods on credit. (Fraser, 86) The prices of purchased goods were noted in an account book (ledger) or on a bill. From time to time, most customers paid all or part of that bill by service, cash or trade. In order for the credit-based system to work, not only did the customers have to be honest, trustworthy and able to pay off their debts in a timely fashion, but the shop owner had to be equally as honest, trustworthy, and able to bear the various debts of often an entire village. In many cases, the shop owner was a man in good circumstances and was able to wait until sales of crops or livestock enabled farmers to pay for items purchased throughout the year.
Crysler's Store, Upper Canada Village Morriston Ontario |
There were a number of ways in which a family or
individual could repay the store owner for items purchased on credit. The three most popular methods include
payment through service or labour; delayed payment using cash, or payment through
trade. Payment through service or labour
included for example, splitting and piling wood for the shop owner, lending the
shop owner a horse or ox for a project, or lending skills such as
blacksmithing, etc. (Fleming, 127-129) Payment using cash occurred whenever the
family or individual had some to spare – usually in the fall of each year,
after the “threshing” or the “killing”. (Sherck) It was also not uncommon for the shop owner to institute a monthly collection
whereby accounts were required to be settled by the end of each calendar month.
Some debts could be repaid by trading in chickens,
eggs, or butter. In October 1861, James
Watson, a shop owner in Lindsay advertised through the local newspaper that he
would accept “all kinds of country produce” as payment. (Fleming, 26) A Manilla shop owner, Adam Gordon, also advertised that he would purchase
“Wheat, Pork, and other farm produce, at the Highest Market Prices”. (Fleming, 26) Payment through trade was extremely common,
but must not be confused with pure bartering.
Each object (usually by weight) had a dollar amount attached to it, and
customers did not, for example, simply trade eggs for tea. Every transaction was entered into the
ledgers, and one dollar’s worth of tea must be offset by at least one dollar’s
worth of eggs.
There were also many
instances where arrangements were made between businesses which allowed for
labourers to be paid in credit to the local general store or to a trade,
eliminating the need for workers to handle cash: “Every builder or contractor made an
arrangement with the various trades and stores for a line of credit, by which
they could pay their workman as much of their wages as possible with the
smallest amount of cash.” (Guillet, 240) Worker’s wives would then go and pick up items from the store as needed without
the requirement for currency to exchange hands.
The items purchased would simply be deducted from the credit provided by
the employer. Likewise, the Three-Way System
involved little to no exchange of money.
For example “In Glencarin, Ontario
(west of Barrie ),
millworkers paid for their laundry indirectly. Storekeeper and mill owner M.N. Stephens would
deduct a dollar or two from wages and enter that amount as a credit on the
laundry woman’s account”. (Fleming, 138)
General Store Interior, Black Creek Pioneer Village Toronto, Ontario |
Sources
W. Hamish Fraser's 1981 The Coming of the Mass Market,1850-1914.
R.B. Fleming's 2002 General Stores of Canada:Merchants and Memories.
Edwin C. Guillet's 1934 Toronto, from Trading Post to
McCalla, Douglas. “Retailing in the Countryside: Upper Canadian General
Stores in the Mid-Nineteenth Century”. In Business
and Economic History, Winter 1997; 26, 2. Pages 393-403.
No comments:
Post a Comment